Re: [Java] why java is not fully object oriented ???

 

Java Object Oriented
 
All of the data types (int , long , double , boolean ,......) not Object Oriented  but there
exist corresponding data types Object Oriented (Integer , Long ,Double , Boolean , ...)
so I see Java 100% Object Oriented
 

--- On Mon, 1/4/10, David Kramer <david@thekramers.net> wrote:

From: David Kramer <david@thekramers.net>
Subject: Re: [Java] why java is not fully object oriented ???
To: Java_Official@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, January 4, 2010, 8:31 PM

 

Chetan Patel wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have heared that java is not 100% object Oriented but which the
> features of java breaks the rules of Object Oriented programming ?
> Can anybody give me answer. ?

It's not that Java breaks the rules of object oriented programming, but
not all data types in Java are object oriented. All of the data types
that begin with a lower-case letter (ints, longs, double, boolean, etc)
are not objects.

Whether this is bad or good is a matter of opinion. Objects take up
more space and are much more expensive to create, serialize, and destroy
than their non-object counterparts.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group

Messages in this topic (6)

Recent Activity:

• New Members 37

Visit Your Group Start a New Topic

Visit http://aiaiai.com or http://jgame.org for more groups to join.
Java Official Group is created for the following topics: Java 2 Enterprise Edition - J2EE, Java 2 Standard Edition - J2SE, Java 2 Micro Edition - J2ME, XML, XSL, XSD, XPATH, Web Services, Jini, JXTA for all type of Java Geeks.
Whoever posts spam / ads / job related message will be BANNED IMMEDIATELY

MARKETPLACE

Going Green: Your Yahoo! Groups resource for green living

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___