linuxgeek: Re: [LINUX_Newbies] Ubuntu 12.10 Slooooow Acer Aspire Atom w/ 2GB

I am not sure why you installed 12.10. It has no support, so you cannot even get updates to fix any problems that you might have. Six month releases like 12.10 only had 18 months, so support ran out over a year ago. Now six month releases only get nine months support. Your best bet is to install either 12.04 or 14.04 which have five years of support because they are LTS (long term support). Reports on 14.04 are good as far as speed improvements. BTW the number in front of the decimal is the year of release and the number after is the month. So 12.04 expires in 2017.

It is unfair to make comparisons between XP and Ubuntu. XP is a ten year old operating system and Ubuntu is more current. It is like comparing XP with Vista or Windows 7 and and saying Vista is slower. Of course it is. There is more happening in a newer operating system and everything gets bigger including the applications. That is just to be expected in any operating system because they are pushing the limits and competing with newer versions of other OSes.

For what it is worth, I do not find Unity (Ubuntu's desktop environment) particularly fast. There are faster options like XFCE and I find even KDE to be faster.

Roy

On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 8:24:10 AM, "jon.perelstein@gmail.com [LINUX_Newbies]" <LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

I recently installed Ubuntu 12.10 on an Acer Aspire One netbook that is running an Atom Z520 chip (Ubuntu says it is 1.33GHz x 2). The machine has 2 GB memory installed (verified by Ubuntu). This install replaced Win XP that came on the machine - I reformatted the HD (155 GB) and completely eliminated Windows - in other words, it is a full install and not a dual boot situation (it doesn't ask me to select an operating system when it boots up, so I have to believe I got the single boot right). Ubuntu agrees that it is a 155 GB drive and tells me that I have about 144 GB remaining.

It is just unacceptably slow.

Much slower than Win XP on that machine. For example, it takes about 20 seconds for Firefox to open in Ubuntu vs. about 10 seconds in XP on that machine. Libre Office takes about 30 seconds to open versus about 10 seconds in XP on that machine. There is a noticeable delay in typing on Libre Office under Ubuntu (characters appear on the screen 3-5 characters behind what I'm typing) versus sharp crisp response under XP. It typically takes 10 seconds to open an individual email in GMail versus 2-3 seconds under XP.

When windows/screens (whatever they're called in Ubuntu) open, they open small and transparent and then grow to full size and full opacity over a period of seconds in steps. It is annoying, especially given the delay between clicking on something and that something being open and ready to accept input from the keyboard. Even the command button (the little gear cog on the top right) is slow to respond.

Yes, I did measure response times before I switched to Ubuntu because I was expecting improvements and wanted to see just what kind of improvement I was getting. Instead, I'm ready to give up on Ubuntu and go back to Windows.

I have no idea what Ubuntu does for drivers - does it just load some generic drivers for keyboards, display, etc. that could be slowing things down? Was I supposed to find some Ubuntu drivers for this machine and load them? I didn't specifically load any drivers - but everything was working (just slowly) once I finished the install.

Is this just normal for Ubuntu on a machine like this (I can't believe that it's slower than XP) or can people start pointing me to ways to fix this problem. And no, I'm not going to do my own recompiles of the Kernel or buy all sorts of extra special software - either Ubuntu makes sense on a machine like this, or it doesn't. All the advertising/proselytizing says it does make sense, so is the advertising right or wrong?

Thanks,

Jon

__._,_.___

Posted by: Linux Canuck <linuxcanuck@yahoo.ca>

Reply via web post

•

Reply to sender

•

Reply to group

•

Start a New Topic

•