Tuesday, April 26, 2016

Re: [LINUX_Newbies] TEST for 64-bit

 

I'd skip the DVR burning and make live USB sticks. Much cheaper more reliable.  Guess it depends on what distro you're installing. 

On Wednesday, April 27, 2016, david poston dvdposton@gmail.com [LINUX_Newbies] <LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com> wrote:



I did an search for the G3250 and it is does have 64 bit support. Something may be wrong with the DVD. 
I would redownload  and burn another dist.

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:18 AM, david poston <dvdposton@gmail.com> wrote:
If you go into the BIOS on start-up, you can if out there.

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:02 AM, cs@zip.com.au [LINUX_Newbies] <LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 

Don't "uname -p" or "uname -m" tell you anything interesting?

Cheers,
Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>



On 26Apr2016 22:42, Michael Sullivan <msulli1355@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 04/26/2016 10:34 PM, Michael Sullivan wrote:
>> No. It's an Intel Dual Core. I don't have a GUI installed on it yet,
>> and every time I try to scp something over from there to here I put in
>> the password and it says "Agent pid" and some number. How do I get
>> passed that?
>> On 04/26/2016 10:17 PM, J dreadpiratejeff@gmail.com [LINUX_Newbies] wrote:
>>> Also, pretty much every modern x86 CPU is 64 bit. The only 32 bit ones I
>>> know of are ARM chips or the cheapest Atom chips.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, April 26, 2016, J <dreadpiratejeff@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:dreadpiratejeff@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Fastest way would be to just look up the processor model on the
>>> internet. If it's an Intel chip, search the Ark
>>> (http://ark.intel.com). Not sure what AMDs cpu db is.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, April 26, 2016, Michael Sullivan msulli1355@gmail.com
>>> [LINUX_Newbies] <LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there a Linux test that I can do to see if my computer is
>>> 64-bit? I
>>> got a new one in today, and the shop that built it for me says
>>> that it's
>>> 64-bit, but the 64-bit LiveDVD I burned won't boot. The
>>> LiveDVD did
>>> suggest that my kernel should be 64-bit (64-bit kernel was
>>> turned ON in
>>> menuconfig), but the kernel failed to build with that option,
>>> possibly
>>> because all the other files on the system were 32-bit. I'm just
>>> wondering is it, or isn't it?
>>>
>>>
>
>My ~/.bashrc file at this moment says:
>
># .bashrc
>
># User specific aliases and functions
>alias ls="ls --color"
>alias ll='ls -lh'
>alias ssh='ssh -Y -C'
>alias useflag='grep /usr/portage/profiles/use.*desc -e'
>alias su="/bin/su"
>export CPATH=/usr/kde/3.3/include/:$CPATH
>eval `ssh-agent`
>
># Source global definitions
>if [ -f /etc/bashrc ]; then
> . /etc/bashrc
>fi
>
>#export CLASSPATH="$CLASSPATH:/home/michael/projects/java/myFantasy:."
>export PS1='\[\033[01;32m\]\u@\h\[\033[01;34m\] \W \$\[\033[00m\] '
>export PATH="$PATH:/home/michael/.bin"
>#export CVSROOT=/var/cvsroot
>
>I don't HAVE a ~/.bash_profile.
>
>
>------------------------------------
>Posted by: Michael Sullivan <msulli1355@gmail.com>
>------------------------------------





__._,_.___

Posted by: J <dreadpiratejeff@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (11)

Upgrade your account with the latest Yahoo Mail app
Get organized with the fast and easy-to-use Yahoo Mail app. Upgrade today!

To unsubscribe from this list, please email LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com & you will be removed.

.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment