Monday, June 25, 2012

Re: [LINUX_Newbies] Question about ./configure

 

On 25Jun2012 14:14, msulli1355 <msulli1355@gmail.com> wrote:
| I'm a Gentoo user.

Me too.

| I started using Gentoo in 2005. Since that time
| I've very rarely been able to install non-portage software successully.
| Usually it fails during the make phase. Otherwise, non-portage software
| has always used the ./configure-make-make install cycle. As a result,
| I'm completely clueless when it comes to building non-portage software.
| I'm currently trying to build some source code I downloaded from svn:
|
| michael@carter /home/work/trunk $ ./configure

Before we dig into the actual issue, I would like to suggest that this
is not how you should be invoking configure. By default, configure will
build things to install in /usr. That is where the vendr (Gentoo)
packages are installed. This generally does not play out well later.

Instead, build third party (i.e. not from emerge) packages thus:

./configure --prefix=/us/local

This installs under /us/local (eg /us/local/bin/lua and so forth), and
will not conflict with packages from Gentoo. /usr/local/bin is usually
in the default $PATH (check yours to be sure) exactly to accomodate this
scheme.

[...]
| checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
| checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
| checking for LUA... no
| configure: error: Package requirements (lua5.1 >= LUA_REQUIRED_VERSION) were not met:
|
| No package 'lua5.1' found
|
| Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
| installed software in a non-standard prefix.
|
| Alternatively, you may set the environment variables LUA_CFLAGS
| and LUA_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
| See the pkg-config man page for more details.

It looks like configure is looking for 'lua5.1'. But lua is known as
'lua' to pkg-config on gentoo:

pkg-config --list-all | grep lua

Also:

find /usr -xdev -name lua\*.pc

The .pc file it finds is just a text file, you can "cat" it to inspect
it.

Just to check, try this:

pkg-config --exists lua && echo YES

It should print YES. And this:

pkg-config --modversion lua

should show something like 5.1.4.

Now look in the build directory, where you ran configure, using:

ls -ltra

the recent files are at the bottom of the listing. There should be a
"config.log" file. See if it has useful stuff that the bottom, where
its checks for lua failed.

Finally, run:

./configure --help

That will print a huge amount of standard boilerplate, but buried in it
about halfway down is a section on options for the build, which can have
lua-specific things to assist it in finding lua. But it looks to me like
it is simply looking for lua incorrectly.

Since configure is just a (huge and ugly) shell script, we may end up
having to hack it into sanity.

Cheers,
--

Ed Campbell's <ed@Tekelex.Com> pointers for long trips:
4. Inspect your bike carefully, check the oil, and lube the chain
every time you stop.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
To unsubscribe from this list, please email LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com & you will be removed.
.

__,_._,___

[LINUX_Newbies] Question about ./configure

 

I'm a Gentoo user. I started using Gentoo in 2005. Since that time I've very rarely been able to install non-portage software successully. Usually it fails during the make phase. Otherwise, non-portage software has always used the ./configure-make-make install cycle. As a result, I'm completely clueless when it comes to building non-portage software. I'm currently trying to build some source code I downloaded from svn:

michael@carter /home/work/trunk $ ./configure
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /usr/bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking for suffix of executables...
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3
checking for g++... g++
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
checking dependency style of g++... gcc3
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... g++ -E
checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep
checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... no
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for LUA... no
configure: error: Package requirements (lua5.1 >= LUA_REQUIRED_VERSION) were not met:

No package 'lua5.1' found

Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively, you may set the environment variables LUA_CFLAGS
and LUA_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
See the pkg-config man page for more details.
michael@carter /home/work/trunk $

I have lua:
ichael@carter /home/work/trunk $ sudo emerge -pv lua
Password:

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild R ] dev-lang/lua-5.1.4-r4 USE="deprecated readline -emacs -static" 212 kB

Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 212 kB

I even know where it lives:
michael@carter /home/work/trunk $ ls /usr/lib/liblua*
/usr/lib/liblua.a /usr/lib/liblua.so /usr/lib/liblua.so.5.1.4
/usr/lib/liblua.la /usr/lib/liblua.so.5
michael@carter /home/work/trunk $

So how do I get configure to recognize that lua is on the system?

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
To unsubscribe from this list, please email LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com & you will be removed.
.

__,_._,___

Monday, June 18, 2012

[LINUX_Newbies] Re: Live CD/DVD

 



--- In LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com, "KLaus" <klauslms@...> wrote:
>
> Sorry for delay, but I have no older copy of UBUNTU.
> But 12.04 comes up with no screen, but after some time I can hear the " little drum roll".
> Second Itriend Scientific Linux, initialisation stopps with the errormessage "BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000001c ". What does that mean?
> Regards
> Charlyms
>

If it was me and I had to take a wild stab at it I'd MD5sum the disk image I was using and if that tested good then I'd run memtest.

Both of those options are available to select when you run the install CD. Normally I'd say good luck but in your case I'm going to say I hope your CD fails its integrity test. I think it is the best thing you can have bad.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
To unsubscribe from this list, please email LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com & you will be removed.
.

__,_._,___

[LINUX_Newbies] Re: Live CD/DVD

 



--- In LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com, "KLaus" <klauslms@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com, "Jim Scott" <bsddaemon@> wrote:
> >
> > Not sure if this would help, but have you tried an older version of Ubuntu? I had an issue with Ubuntu 12.04 not detecting my RAID. I tried Ubuntu 10.04.4 and it worked, I then used the upgrade utility to update to 12.04 via 10.10 and 11.04.
> >
> > Jim
> >
At least I found and tested a copy of Ubuntu 7.10, graphics are fine but no mouse-support.
Regards
Charlyms

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
To unsubscribe from this list, please email LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com & you will be removed.
.

__,_._,___

Sunday, June 17, 2012

[LINUX_Newbies] Re: Live CD/DVD

 



--- In LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com, "Jim Scott" <bsddaemon@...> wrote:
>
> Not sure if this would help, but have you tried an older version of Ubuntu? I had an issue with Ubuntu 12.04 not detecting my RAID. I tried Ubuntu 10.04.4 and it worked, I then used the upgrade utility to update to 12.04 via 10.10 and 11.04.
>
> Jim
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Sorry for delay, but I have no older copy of UBUNTU.
But 12.04 comes up with no screen, but after some time I can hear the " little drum roll".
Second Itriend Scientific Linux, initialisation stopps with the errormessage "BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000001c ". What does that mean?
Regards
Charlyms

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
To unsubscribe from this list, please email LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com & you will be removed.
.

__,_._,___

Re: [LINUX_Newbies] Re: What I've been up to with Linux lately

Thanks for your concern for my soul. :)

Most people are polluted and there are few purists. I agree that Debian
does great upstream work and this is what they excel at. Most people do not
get the water at the source. They get it close to where they live and work.
People live and work in all kinds of situations which means that there is
no one kind of user. People have varying needs and we cannot all drink from
the same cup. That is the crux of the matter. Debian and software freedom
types want everybody to drink the same Kool-Aid as they do.

Freedom has to mean that people are truly free. If you allow one person or
group to narrowly define your freedom then you are not free. You live in a
cage.

People can choose to do that of their own free will. But when you remove
the other choices as valid options or you attempt to ridicule them into
submission then you remove free choice. This parallels what is happening in
society today where one religious group tries to forces its morals on
another group. If people choose them freely then that is consensus, but
when they are forced both sides lose. The side which loses its freedom is
forced into submission (often at a high cost), but the one doing to forcing
loses their moral superiority and become hypocrites.

For me, it is an educational issue. I agree with free software as an
*ideal*, but am practical. We need to work towards it as a goal and not try
to force it on people and in the meantime we need to educate and work hard.
It may not sound like it, but I am a FSF supporter and admire RMS. I am
also a critic because I think they have an admirable goal, but want to fast
track things.

When we discuss things we can agree on some level. I agree with you in
principle. It is the practise on which we disagree. That does not make me
or you wrong. It is a process and that takes time.

Roy

Using Kubuntu 12.04, 64-bit
Location: Canada


On 16 June 2012 17:34, Paul <pfrederick1@yahoo.com> wrote:

> **
>
>
>
>
> --- In LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com, Roy <linuxcanuck@...> wrote:
> >
> > It is not a question of credibility or right or wrong. It is an
> unwinnable
> > argument, both ways. We have choice. I have chosen what works for me and
> > you have chosen what works for you. Most people avoid Debian and prefer a
> > sensible distribution based on it because Debian has made it hard for
> > users. Debian's users make it doubly hard when they go on a crusade. I am
> > selling nothing and not in a p*ssing contest. You took things out of
> > context to make it so. My comment about trying hundreds of distros was
> > linked to Debian not working as hundreds of others do, not to any
> bragging.
> > I wonder why you would do such a thing?
> >
> > The bottom line is in the numbers. Debian is fading to the point that
> many
> > writers and columnists have questioned its relevance and long term
> > viability. There is a reason for that. The stripping away of binary blobs
> > in Debian 6 did nothing to help. Erecting barriers to usage is not going
> to
> > make your distribution more popular or more accessible. That was their
> > stated goal for Debian 6 and they shot themselves in the foot. In
> addition,
> > they failed to gain the seal of approval from the FSF, so they gained
> > nothing.
> >
> > Debian is a terrific ecosystem. It is worth preserving and it would be
> much
> > easier for users of Debian forks to respect Debian, if Debian users were
> > not so angry at the rest of the world. The hatred goes one way. Debian
> does
> > not respect any distro that builds on it if it makes it more user
> friendly
> > or is not in line with its own philosophy. Other distros are not like
> that.
> > Shuttleworth loves what Mint is doing and says so publicly. He does not
> > take every opportunity to dump on it as Debian users do with Ubuntu. In
> > Planet Fedora I see lots of respect being given to Fedora derivatives.
> You
> > cannot get respect without giving it.
> >
> > You might think that I hate Debian, but I do not. I rag on it because I
> > want it to get better and succeed. I have long thought that there is a
> > problem in the Debian community and their disrespect for anything that
> does
> > not conform to their ideals, from FF to Ubuntu. There is nothing wrong
> with
> > ideology. We should be free to have opinions that differ. Debian does not
> > seem to get that freedom means freedom to disagree.
> >
> > We disagree, but it should not result in harsh words, unless you don't
> > think that contrary views are unacceptable. If so, then you do not live
> in
> > a free world, but a dictatorship.
> >
> > Roy
> >
> > Using Kubuntu 12.04, 64-bit
> > Location: Canada
>
> You've some crazy notions I'll give you that. There is Debian which is the
> wellspring then there are all the down stream pretenders that just muddy
> the waters. Your mind has been polluted by the impure.
>
> Pray to St. iGNUcius to deliver you from evil and save your mortal soul!
>
> http://stallman.org/saint.html
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this list, please email LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com & you will be removed.Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LINUX_Newbies/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LINUX_Newbies/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
LINUX_Newbies-digest@yahoogroups.com
LINUX_Newbies-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[LINUX_Newbies] Re: debian 6

 



--- In LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com, Scott <scottro@...> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:42:14AM -0000, Pascal wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- In LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <pfrederick1@> wrote:
> >
> > > I didn't know you could edit the sudoers with a plain text editor. I thought that was what visudo was for?
> >
> >
> > Isn't that what visudo actually does? Open the sudoers-file with vi?
> >
> It opens the sudoers file with the default editor. For example, I
> believe that on Ubuntu, it will open the sudoers file with nano.
>
> The other thing it does is check for syntax errors. That is, if you
> make a syntax error while editing, it will warn you.
>
> You can edit the sudoers file with any text editor, visudo is just a bit
> of an additional safeguard.

It can't hurt to be safe. Plus it is the shortest command to type to do the job. We all know the shortest command is the best one.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
To unsubscribe from this list, please email LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com & you will be removed.
.

__,_._,___

Saturday, June 16, 2012

[LINUX_Newbies] Re: debian 6

 



--- In LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com, Scott <scottro@...> wrote:

> It opens the sudoers file with the default editor. For example, I
> believe that on Ubuntu, it will open the sudoers file with nano.
>
> The other thing it does is check for syntax errors. That is, if you
> make a syntax error while editing, it will warn you.
>
> You can edit the sudoers file with any text editor, visudo is just a bit
> of an additional safeguard.
>

Didn't know that, now I do!

Pascal

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
To unsubscribe from this list, please email LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com & you will be removed.
.

__,_._,___

[LINUX_Newbies] Re: What I've been up to with Linux lately

 



--- In LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com, Roy <linuxcanuck@...> wrote:
>
> It is not a question of credibility or right or wrong. It is an unwinnable
> argument, both ways. We have choice. I have chosen what works for me and
> you have chosen what works for you. Most people avoid Debian and prefer a
> sensible distribution based on it because Debian has made it hard for
> users. Debian's users make it doubly hard when they go on a crusade. I am
> selling nothing and not in a p*ssing contest. You took things out of
> context to make it so. My comment about trying hundreds of distros was
> linked to Debian not working as hundreds of others do, not to any bragging.
> I wonder why you would do such a thing?
>
> The bottom line is in the numbers. Debian is fading to the point that many
> writers and columnists have questioned its relevance and long term
> viability. There is a reason for that. The stripping away of binary blobs
> in Debian 6 did nothing to help. Erecting barriers to usage is not going to
> make your distribution more popular or more accessible. That was their
> stated goal for Debian 6 and they shot themselves in the foot. In addition,
> they failed to gain the seal of approval from the FSF, so they gained
> nothing.
>
> Debian is a terrific ecosystem. It is worth preserving and it would be much
> easier for users of Debian forks to respect Debian, if Debian users were
> not so angry at the rest of the world. The hatred goes one way. Debian does
> not respect any distro that builds on it if it makes it more user friendly
> or is not in line with its own philosophy. Other distros are not like that.
> Shuttleworth loves what Mint is doing and says so publicly. He does not
> take every opportunity to dump on it as Debian users do with Ubuntu. In
> Planet Fedora I see lots of respect being given to Fedora derivatives. You
> cannot get respect without giving it.
>
> You might think that I hate Debian, but I do not. I rag on it because I
> want it to get better and succeed. I have long thought that there is a
> problem in the Debian community and their disrespect for anything that does
> not conform to their ideals, from FF to Ubuntu. There is nothing wrong with
> ideology. We should be free to have opinions that differ. Debian does not
> seem to get that freedom means freedom to disagree.
>
> We disagree, but it should not result in harsh words, unless you don't
> think that contrary views are unacceptable. If so, then you do not live in
> a free world, but a dictatorship.
>
> Roy
>
> Using Kubuntu 12.04, 64-bit
> Location: Canada

You've some crazy notions I'll give you that. There is Debian which is the wellspring then there are all the down stream pretenders that just muddy the waters. Your mind has been polluted by the impure.

Pray to St. iGNUcius to deliver you from evil and save your mortal soul!

http://stallman.org/saint.html

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
To unsubscribe from this list, please email LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com & you will be removed.
.

__,_._,___

Re: [LINUX_Newbies] Re: What I've been up to with Linux lately

 

hi iron,
Best of luck, before that consider about its security features.

By,
ManikandanKajendran

________________________________
From: ironmantis7x <ironmantis7x@yahoo.com>
To: LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 7:37 PM
Subject: [LINUX_Newbies] Re: What I've been up to with Linux lately


 
This is a cool thread!
Lately, I have been using Linux Mint 12 (KDE 32 bit version on my Asus Zenbook) and Linux Mint 13 "Maya" on my desktop PC. I am turning my desktop PC into a web server -- so wish me luck!!

Love Linux and love Linux Mint!

ironmantis7x

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
To unsubscribe from this list, please email LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com & you will be removed.
.

__,_._,___

[LINUX_Newbies] Re: What I've been up to with Linux lately

 

This is a cool thread!
Lately, I have been using Linux Mint 12 (KDE 32 bit version on my Asus Zenbook) and Linux Mint 13 "Maya" on my desktop PC. I am turning my desktop PC into a web server -- so wish me luck!!

Love Linux and love Linux Mint!

ironmantis7x

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
To unsubscribe from this list, please email LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com & you will be removed.
.

__,_._,___

Re: [LINUX_Newbies] Re: What I've been up to with Linux lately

It is not a question of credibility or right or wrong. It is an unwinnable
argument, both ways. We have choice. I have chosen what works for me and
you have chosen what works for you. Most people avoid Debian and prefer a
sensible distribution based on it because Debian has made it hard for
users. Debian's users make it doubly hard when they go on a crusade. I am
selling nothing and not in a p*ssing contest. You took things out of
context to make it so. My comment about trying hundreds of distros was
linked to Debian not working as hundreds of others do, not to any bragging.
I wonder why you would do such a thing?

The bottom line is in the numbers. Debian is fading to the point that many
writers and columnists have questioned its relevance and long term
viability. There is a reason for that. The stripping away of binary blobs
in Debian 6 did nothing to help. Erecting barriers to usage is not going to
make your distribution more popular or more accessible. That was their
stated goal for Debian 6 and they shot themselves in the foot. In addition,
they failed to gain the seal of approval from the FSF, so they gained
nothing.

Debian is a terrific ecosystem. It is worth preserving and it would be much
easier for users of Debian forks to respect Debian, if Debian users were
not so angry at the rest of the world. The hatred goes one way. Debian does
not respect any distro that builds on it if it makes it more user friendly
or is not in line with its own philosophy. Other distros are not like that.
Shuttleworth loves what Mint is doing and says so publicly. He does not
take every opportunity to dump on it as Debian users do with Ubuntu. In
Planet Fedora I see lots of respect being given to Fedora derivatives. You
cannot get respect without giving it.

You might think that I hate Debian, but I do not. I rag on it because I
want it to get better and succeed. I have long thought that there is a
problem in the Debian community and their disrespect for anything that does
not conform to their ideals, from FF to Ubuntu. There is nothing wrong with
ideology. We should be free to have opinions that differ. Debian does not
seem to get that freedom means freedom to disagree.

We disagree, but it should not result in harsh words, unless you don't
think that contrary views are unacceptable. If so, then you do not live in
a free world, but a dictatorship.

Roy

Using Kubuntu 12.04, 64-bit
Location: Canada


On 15 June 2012 20:05, Paul <pfrederick1@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> --- In LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com, Roy <linuxcanuck@...> wrote:
> >
> > Using Kubuntu 12.04, 64-bit
> > Location: Canada
> > For gaming try the latest Ubuntu. The Software centre includes many games
> > not available in other distros as Canonical is working closely with
> > gaming companies like Electronic Arts and Humble Indie Bundle. Steam for
> > Linux is supposedly on its way later this year.
> >
> > Paul,
> >
> > The conversation re: Debian 6 is going nowhere. I have said two times, so
> > this is the third, my ethernet card works with every distro but Debian 6
>
> No matter how many times you say it you won't change wrong to right. Your
> Ethernet Adapter works with Debian, you just cannot manage to make it do
> so. I've told you how.
>
> > and I have tried literally hundreds of distros.
>
> That's nice. I've run Linux for over 17 years now. Who's p*ssing higher up
> the pole?
>
> It is an OTB Realtek. The
> > problem is not the hardware. It is Debian. BTW, it worked with Debian 5
> so
> > they made it not work by removing the binary blobs. That is okay by me.
> But
> > they did not provide a way to get them that was workable. That left me
> out
> > in the cold as far as Debian 6 went. The fault lies with Debian, not me
> or
> > my card (which is one of the most common cards on the market). My
> > conclusion is that they are putting ideology ahead of people. That is why
> > Debian has been relegated to a has been distro. I don't know how I could
> > conclude otherwise.
>
> Maybe if you did not run a distribution based on Debian your words would
> carry more weight? You run a monkeyed with Debian. End of story. I must
> assume you need your dope OS cut, and cannot hack it yourself in the pure
> state.
>
> They do not care about users. They said as much when I
> > contacted them. They told me to buy a new card. How is that helpful?
> >
>
> I wasn't there so I don't know what lead to that unfortunate exchange.
> I've some idea how it transpired though based on what you are writing now.
>
> > I appreciate that people are zealous about freedom, but somewhere the
> > rubber must reach the road. In order to be successful, you must start
> where
> > people are and move them along gradually. The reality is that most people
> > have non-free hardware. You cannot cut them off cold turkey and expect
> then
> > to be happy about it.
>
> What your argument basically boils down to is simply this, you don't want
> Debian to properly classify code based on what it is in reality. Non-free
> closed source is not in Debian's main repository at all in any way, shape,
> or form. You are trying to fault Debian for doing their job too well.
> Others of us appreciate the fine work that the Debian maintainers do.
>
> You actually do too, you just don't know it. Mr. Using Kubuntu 12.04,
> 64-bit
>
> All Ubuntu, and Ubuntu spin offs are based on Debian. Any distribution
> that uses the dpkg package management system is based on Debian. dpkg =
> Debian PacKaGe manager.
>
> $ man dpkg
>
> dpkg(1) dpkg suite dpkg(1)
>
> NAME
> dpkg - package manager for Debian
>
> >
> > Roy
>
> P.S. I have to agree with your Roy you really have gone nowhere with this
> conversation. In fact I'd have to say you're losing credibility with each
> post.
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this list, please email LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com & you will be removed.Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LINUX_Newbies/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LINUX_Newbies/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
LINUX_Newbies-digest@yahoogroups.com
LINUX_Newbies-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Friday, June 15, 2012

[LINUX_Newbies] Re: What I've been up to with Linux lately

 



--- In LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com, Roy <linuxcanuck@...> wrote:
>
> Using Kubuntu 12.04, 64-bit
> Location: Canada
> For gaming try the latest Ubuntu. The Software centre includes many games
> not available in other distros as Canonical is working closely with
> gaming companies like Electronic Arts and Humble Indie Bundle. Steam for
> Linux is supposedly on its way later this year.
>
> Paul,
>
> The conversation re: Debian 6 is going nowhere. I have said two times, so
> this is the third, my ethernet card works with every distro but Debian 6

No matter how many times you say it you won't change wrong to right. Your Ethernet Adapter works with Debian, you just cannot manage to make it do so. I've told you how.

> and I have tried literally hundreds of distros.

That's nice. I've run Linux for over 17 years now. Who's p*ssing higher up the pole?

It is an OTB Realtek. The
> problem is not the hardware. It is Debian. BTW, it worked with Debian 5 so
> they made it not work by removing the binary blobs. That is okay by me. But
> they did not provide a way to get them that was workable. That left me out
> in the cold as far as Debian 6 went. The fault lies with Debian, not me or
> my card (which is one of the most common cards on the market). My
> conclusion is that they are putting ideology ahead of people. That is why
> Debian has been relegated to a has been distro. I don't know how I could
> conclude otherwise.

Maybe if you did not run a distribution based on Debian your words would carry more weight? You run a monkeyed with Debian. End of story. I must assume you need your dope OS cut, and cannot hack it yourself in the pure state.

They do not care about users. They said as much when I
> contacted them. They told me to buy a new card. How is that helpful?
>

I wasn't there so I don't know what lead to that unfortunate exchange. I've some idea how it transpired though based on what you are writing now.

> I appreciate that people are zealous about freedom, but somewhere the
> rubber must reach the road. In order to be successful, you must start where
> people are and move them along gradually. The reality is that most people
> have non-free hardware. You cannot cut them off cold turkey and expect then
> to be happy about it.

What your argument basically boils down to is simply this, you don't want Debian to properly classify code based on what it is in reality. Non-free closed source is not in Debian's main repository at all in any way, shape, or form. You are trying to fault Debian for doing their job too well. Others of us appreciate the fine work that the Debian maintainers do.

You actually do too, you just don't know it. Mr. Using Kubuntu 12.04, 64-bit

All Ubuntu, and Ubuntu spin offs are based on Debian. Any distribution that uses the dpkg package management system is based on Debian. dpkg = Debian PacKaGe manager.

$ man dpkg

dpkg(1) dpkg suite dpkg(1)

NAME
dpkg - package manager for Debian

>
> Roy

P.S. I have to agree with your Roy you really have gone nowhere with this conversation. In fact I'd have to say you're losing credibility with each post.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
To unsubscribe from this list, please email LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com & you will be removed.
.

__,_._,___

Re: [LINUX_Newbies] Re: debian 6

 

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:42:14AM -0000, Pascal wrote:
>
>
> --- In LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <pfrederick1@...> wrote:
>
> > I didn't know you could edit the sudoers with a plain text editor. I thought that was what visudo was for?
>
>
> Isn't that what visudo actually does? Open the sudoers-file with vi?
>
It opens the sudoers file with the default editor. For example, I
believe that on Ubuntu, it will open the sudoers file with nano.

The other thing it does is check for syntax errors. That is, if you
make a syntax error while editing, it will warn you.

You can edit the sudoers file with any text editor, visudo is just a bit
of an additional safeguard.

--
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

Buffy: I didn't jump to conclusions. I took a small step, and
conclusions there were.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
To unsubscribe from this list, please email LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com & you will be removed.
.

__,_._,___

[LINUX_Newbies] Re: debian 6

 



--- In LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com, "Pascal" <pascal.bernhard@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <pfrederick1@> wrote:
>
> > I didn't know you could edit the sudoers with a plain text editor. I thought that was what visudo was for?
>
>
> Isn't that what visudo actually does? Open the sudoers-file with vi?
>
> Pascal
>

man visudo

DESCRIPTION
visudo edits the sudoers file in a safe fashion, analogous to vipw(8).
visudo locks the sudoers file against multiple simultaneous edits,
provides basic sanity checks, and checks for parse errors. If the
sudoers file is currently being edited you will receive a message to
try again later.

Apparently it does a bit more.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
To unsubscribe from this list, please email LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com & you will be removed.
.

__,_._,___