On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 01:20, Scott <scottro@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 05:47:13AM -0000, dbneeley wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I do agree that for most new users the Debian-based distributions tend to be less of a problem than those still clinging to the RPM system. Although Red Hat has claimed for a few years now that they are working on a replacement for RPM that handles dependencies better, so far nothing has been forthcoming.
>>
>
> Not arguing for or against Deb based vs. RH based. However, yum is,
> IMHO, probably comparable to apt as far as being a front end for rpm as
> apt is to dpkg. It handles dependencies, gives you ways to work around
> them, and has one nice featuer that may or may not be in apt, the
> "provides"--for example, if you try to build a package and get
> libwhatever.so.5-1/2 not found, you can run
>
> yum provides */libwhatever.so.5-1/2.
>
> It will then search its database, and come back whatever packages may
> provide this particular library.
>
> At any rate, at this time, I'd have to say that yum does do quite well
> at handling dependencies. Not perfect, it can have problems here and
> there, but of course, so can apt.
For those of us who no longer wear the Red Fedora, there is apt-file like so:
bladernr@klaatu:~$ apt-file search /lib32/libdrm.so.2
ia32-libs: /lib32/libdrm.so.2
ia32-libs: /lib32/libdrm.so.2.4.0
Though you do have to install apt-file as it's not part of the default
apt tool set.
>
> --
> Scott Robbins
> PGP keyID EB3467D6
> ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6
>
> Buffy: I lost a friend tonight and I may lose more! The whole
> world may be sucked into hell, and you want my help 'cause your
> girlfriend's a big ho?! Let me take this opportunity to NOT care!
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, please email LINUX_Newbies-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com & you will be removed.Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment