Hi Scott and all,
Scott wrote
> ...Yeah, I meant to say sda. Apologies.
>
> Sometimes, in my experience, an installer will consider the detachable
> drive, especially if it's a USB, sda. I've always been able to just
> install to what the installer called sdb ...
That certainly turned out to be what was happening. I got
an apparently good install by going with the sdb as being
the system on the target computer.
I tried for a root of 30 GB, a swap of 2GB, and the rest of my
160 GB as my home file. That way, at very least, I expect to
be able to quickly do a backup of whatever is unique to my
system. If the old beast lasts long enough, I may be able to
do some future upgrade smoothly.
FWIW, my result appears to run slower than Version 16 with
its default setup; however this is an old machine and it may
have just gotten a little closer to its end.
Thanks for all the help. There were a lot of unexpectedly-
strange-to-me things in this.
--
Regards,
Gene Falck
gfalck@merr.com
Posted by: "Gene C. Falck" <gfalck@merr.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (11) |
No comments:
Post a Comment